Re: Status of SCHED_ULE?

From: Morten Rodal <morten_at_rodal.no>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:15:35 +0200
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
> > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under
> > bursts of load (i.e. a compile)
> >
> 
> I have not had this experience.  Can you give me details of your machine
> and the kind of load that causes slugishness?  I'll correct it as soon as
> I can identify it.
> 

The machine is an dual Pentium 2 300MHz, and I'm running gnome 2.4.
I do also experience this with my computer at school, a single Pentium3
733MHz.

The load isn't very complicated, usually just gnome 2.4 and mozilla
firebird running.  If I then do anything that requires lots of cpu,
like a compile of a program, the interactivity drops fast.

On the dual machine I have also experienced a *HUGE* increase in the
time for "portupgrade -ar" to complete.  I am not familiar with how
portupgrade works, but it seems to spawn a few make's and sort's, but
I am not sure why it is currently using 3 hours instead of 10 minutes
to complete! (This was tested when there was no packages to upgrade,
which shouldn't take long)

Both machines (this dual and the one at school) are running with a
libmap.conf in order to use libkse, is this perhaps affecting the
performance of ULE?

I am not sure how useful this is to you, but if you have any other
pointers as to what I should look at just ask.

-- 
Morten Rodal
Received on Sun Sep 28 2003 - 01:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC