Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:33 -0700

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote:
> It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at 
> all.
> 

The answer is probably "no".  Of course, your vague statement
about 4.9 not being stable makes it hard to judge whether 5.1
is a better choice than 4.9.

-- 
Steve

Received on Tue Sep 30 2003 - 07:24:57 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sam Leffler: "Re: Serial debug broken in recent -CURRENT?"
Previous message: Lars Eggert: "Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver"
In reply to: Eriq Lamar: "is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc"
Next in thread: Kevin Oberman: "Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:24 UTC