Re: background_fsck and kernel without SOFTUPDATES

From: Oleg V. Naumann <oleg_at_reis.zp.ua>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:39:04 +0300
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 11:26:48AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Oleg V. Naumann wrote:
> 
> > 	Here is small problem. After removing 'options SOFTUPDATES'
> > from my kernel and rebooting I noticed message from fsck:
> > 'kernel lacks background fsck support'. After that fsck
> > leaves fs's in the inconsistent state. Yes, I know about dependency
> 
> The message is only a warning.  fsck is supposed to re-run fsck_ffs
> without -F if the first run with -F fails.

	Yes, there is some problems with my victim system, sorry for false
alarm. 

> 
> Bruce

-- 
NO37-RIPE
Received on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC