On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 11:26:48AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Oleg V. Naumann wrote: > > > Here is small problem. After removing 'options SOFTUPDATES' > > from my kernel and rebooting I noticed message from fsck: > > 'kernel lacks background fsck support'. After that fsck > > leaves fs's in the inconsistent state. Yes, I know about dependency > > The message is only a warning. fsck is supposed to re-run fsck_ffs > without -F if the first run with -F fails. Yes, there is some problems with my victim system, sorry for false alarm. > > Bruce -- NO37-RIPEReceived on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:39:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC