Re: background_fsck and kernel without SOFTUPDATES

From: Bruce Evans <bde_at_zeta.org.au>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:26:48 +1100 (EST)
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Oleg V. Naumann wrote:

> 	Here is small problem. After removing 'options SOFTUPDATES'
> from my kernel and rebooting I noticed message from fsck:
> 'kernel lacks background fsck support'. After that fsck
> leaves fs's in the inconsistent state. Yes, I know about dependency

The message is only a warning.  fsck is supposed to re-run fsck_ffs
without -F if the first run with -F fails.

Bruce
Received on Fri Mar 26 2004 - 15:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC