Doug White schrieb: >On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Hilko Meyer wrote: >> Doug White schrieb: >> >I haven't had time to look at this. >> > >> >Can y ou try it with -CURRENT, if you ahve't already? >> >> I can, but I don't want to do that. And it's no longer necessary. I've >> installed the recent update of the samba 2.2.8 port this evening and >> discovered the reason of the panic at the time. > >I was able to reproduce this with -current, but looking at the code I >don't understand how that vfs op is getting nulled out. It should be set >to the default operation which just return EOPNOTSUPP. I guess some >KASSERTs are in order. > >The function itself hasn't changed materially in months, so its hard to >tell when this crept in. Out of curiousity, do you have a -stable box Not yet, but I can wipe Linux from one of the dual boot.machines :-) My users use only the installed Win2000 and the SuSE 8.0 is quite old. And we want to replace ist with FreeBSD anyway. I think, we can try -stable before installing 5.2.1, but I dont know, if I can find some time to do so. bye, HilkoReceived on Sat Apr 03 2004 - 04:01:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC