Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > > I have ported over the bridging code from NetBSD and am looking for feedback. > My main question is, 'do people want this in the tree?' > > > The benefits over the current bridge are: > * ability to manage the bridge table > * spanning tree support > * the snazzy brconfig utility > * clonable pseudo-interface (is that a benefit?) My main question is whether I can attach a vlan interface to it and have everything work. That is not the case with the present bridge code, though the Netgraph bridge code _might_ do it (I couldn't get help on some criticial ng infrastructure to do it). -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs_at_newsguy.com dcs_at_freebsd.org capo_at_the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org In related news Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act.Received on Sat Apr 17 2004 - 06:25:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC