Re: /dev/null doesn't get created

* Mark Murray (mark_at_grondar.org) [040801 17:03]:
> From: Mark Murray <mark_at_grondar.org>
> Message-Id: <200408011825.i71IPZgG018406_at_grimreaper.grondar.org>
> To: dlt_at_mebtel.net
> Cc: current_at_FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: /dev/null doesn't get created 
> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:25:34 +0100
> 
> Derek Tattersall writes:
> > CURRENT as of this morning dint'create /dev/null.  My previous
> > CURRENT, from July 25 created it fine so all was well.Can anybody
> > offer me a clue as to what this is all about?  I tried to figure out
> > what causes /dev/null to get created, but was unsuccessful.
> 
> BOOBOO of mine. Please always check src/UPDATING for clues :-)
> 
> M
> --
> Mark Murray
> iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

Well I appear to have cvsup'ed just before you added the text to
UPDATING.  Oh well.  That brings up an interesting question: Under
what circumstances would it be advantageous to not compile the drivers
into the kernel, but leave them as modules and load from
/boot/loader.conf?  I haven't had any luck imagining why you would
want to leave them as modules.

-- 
Derek Tattersall   | "Don't say yes until I finish talking."   --
                   | Darryl F. Zanuck 
dlt_at_mebtel.net     | 
                   | 
dlt666_at_yahoo.com   |