On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:22:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote this message on Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 20:15 +0300: > > >>It is python program, so that ioctl() is out of question. Usage of > > > > > > > > >Hm python has ioctl support, where is the problem? > > > > Really? Anyway, I doubt that name of this ioctl is the same on the > > different unices, so that binary search is still the best from the > > portability POV. > > fcntl.ioctl... it might take some hand expansion of the ioctl macros > to get it though... the old pytoh that would generate these couldn't > handle FreeBSD's ioctl defines (but this was back in the early 4.x > days)... You could always write a simple C program to get the value > necessary.. Heh, but I have other means to spend my spare time. Rewriting perfectly working code for perfection sake is not one of them. -Maxim > > -- > John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 > > "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." > >Received on Wed Aug 04 2004 - 08:27:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:04 UTC