On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > I also had some problems with IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP, changing require > > > to use in the policies fixed that. With require racoon was not able > > > to initiate phase 1, because all non esp traffic was dropped. > > whyever I hadn't seen this posting. Did you noticed Message-Id: <20040805223027.7df0732b_at_Magellan.Leidinger.net> on -current? > > I think this is a datapoint... I use a "require" policy too. ATM I can't > > test with "use" instead. > > but this problem had been fixed months ago for IPSEC. Any other idea for the cause of the observed behavior? Bye, Alexander. -- I'm available to get hired (preferred in .lu). http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Mon Aug 09 2004 - 11:33:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:05 UTC