Re: What's the status of vinum?

From: Josef El-Rayes <josef_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:32:46 +0000

Tim Bishop <tim-lists_at_bishnet.net>:
> When 5.2 is released gvinum should be the default, and should hopefully
> be in a finished state.

i guess you mean 5.3.

greets, josef
-- 
Josef El-Rayes                   (__)
Email:	  josef_at_daemon.li     \\\'',) 
Web:	  http://daemon.li/     \/  \ ^
FreeBSD:  josef_at_FreeBSD.org     .\._/_)

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 09:32:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386"
Previous message: David O'Brien: "Re: your mail"
In reply to: Tim Bishop: "Re: What's the status of vinum?"
Next in thread: Tim Bishop: "Re: What's the status of vinum?"
Reply: Tim Bishop: "Re: What's the status of vinum?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC