-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:31:27AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:49 +0000 (UTC) > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > > > which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD. > > > > > > In my case it's -current from Jul 18. > > > > and use vs. require does make a difference for you ? > > I don't know, I can't test it, the box is in production now. But it > seems to make a difference for Hannes. It made a difference some months ago. I've switched to FAST_IPSEC. Don't know if require and IPSEC is still broken. Best Regards, Hannes Mehnert -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBISX5RcuNlziBjRwRAvwnAJ4k/kWQh1yZKpvF8cWIQC9cs5+gwgCglzCf fwXB6hQGP6a2gESaG4p0t8E= =Jj4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 19:24:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC