Re: Public Access to Perforce?

From: Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:18:26 -0700
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:55:51PM +0800, csj wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms_at_spc.org>
> Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.current
> Cc: <current_at_freebsd.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce?
> 
> 
> >On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:04:03AM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> >>    Is there a read-only account that the general public could use?
> >
> >I think this is an excellent idea. Perhaps one should be set up.
> 
> Perforce license not only limits the user number but also the client 
> number. I don't think a read-only account will work.

If we ever switch to Perforce as our development repository, the primary
source access mechanism will remain CVS as we will maintain a fully CVS
repository that looks just like our current one (with possiable
exception of some early, ill advised, temporary branches).

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

Received on Tue Aug 17 2004 - 14:21:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC