> > > You can try doing a 'make includes' to try to overwirte whatever busted > > > include files you have, but it might not fix things. You may want to grab > > > a snapshot disc and "upgrade" to it. > > > > > Please don't suggest people to run "make includes". This will likely > > break upgrades from older systems because headers (most noticeble one > > is /usr/include/osreldate.h) will not match the installed world, and > > you will fool your buildworld into thinking it's running on a more > > current system than you actually have. > > Yeah I know make includes is evil, but this installation is obviously > missing pieces, and its a last-ditch effort before regressing to a > snapshot. > > Unless you have a better idea :) > I had gotten the source tree off ctm-cvs., which suggests that the cvs tree that the ctm chunks are made from is incomplete. I know my source tree was up to date with regards to it, which is why I was asking. How are people with working build trees getting their sources? Stephen -- "If any question why we died Tell them, because our fathers lied." - Rudyard Kipling.Received on Thu Aug 19 2004 - 17:06:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:07 UTC