On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:05:26PM -0500, Stephen Hocking wrote: > > > > You can try doing a 'make includes' to try to overwirte whatever busted > > > > include files you have, but it might not fix things. You may want to grab > > > > a snapshot disc and "upgrade" to it. > > > > > > > Please don't suggest people to run "make includes". This will likely > > > break upgrades from older systems because headers (most noticeble one > > > is /usr/include/osreldate.h) will not match the installed world, and > > > you will fool your buildworld into thinking it's running on a more > > > current system than you actually have. > > > > Yeah I know make includes is evil, but this installation is obviously > > missing pieces, and its a last-ditch effort before regressing to a > > snapshot. > > > > Unless you have a better idea :) > > > > > I had gotten the source tree off ctm-cvs., which suggests that the cvs tree > that the ctm chunks are made from is incomplete. I know my source tree was up > to date with regards to it, which is why I was asking. How are people with > working build trees getting their sources? > It's not about your source tree, it's about your build system (the contents of /usr/lib, /usr/include, etc. that is likely to be broken). Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:07 UTC