On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:05:10AM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:34:20AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:58:18PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > This has already been fixed in -CURRENT and will presumably be merged into > > > > > RELENG_5 in the next day or two. > > > > > > > > Can you point me to the responsable commit ? > > > > > > kern_lock.c 1.75 > > > > Releasing 5.3 with lockmgr(9) known-broken in one way versus the other > > really is no better. > > I suppose it would have been more accurate to say that it had been worked > around, not fixed, in -CURRENT. This is definitely something that needs to > be properly addressed before the release. > > > Tim The fix was under test by two people who were able to reproduce the error at will. So far I got one positive response and I am waiting for another before doing a commit. -- Alexander KabaevReceived on Tue Aug 24 2004 - 14:17:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:08 UTC