On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:34:20AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:58:18PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > This has already been fixed in -CURRENT and will presumably be merged into > > > > RELENG_5 in the next day or two. > > > > > > Can you point me to the responsable commit ? > > > > kern_lock.c 1.75 > > Releasing 5.3 with lockmgr(9) known-broken in one way versus the other > really is no better. I suppose it would have been more accurate to say that it had been worked around, not fixed, in -CURRENT. This is definitely something that needs to be properly addressed before the release. TimReceived on Tue Aug 24 2004 - 12:05:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:08 UTC