Florian C. Smeets wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> I have made a patch that changes the scheduelr framework to further >> abstract teh scheduler. >> >> it is at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/f.diff >> and should apply agains -current (and probably, though I have not >> tested it yet, against 5.3) >> >> there should be no real change in teh way teh system appears to operate. >> If you are feeling bored you might try applying it to a kernel tree >> and testing it. > > > Hi Julian, > > seems to work, but there is something wrong with the load calculation: hmm I'll look at that tonight.. > > > last pid: 4227; load averages: 576.70, 884.21, 460.30 up > 0+00:15:10 12:05:41 > 141 processes: 3 running, 112 sleeping, 1 zombie, 25 waiting > CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 6.9% system, 1.5% interrupt, > 90.8% idle > Mem: 137M Active, 38M Inact, 50M Wired, 9576K Cache, 34M Buf, 864K Free > Swap: 256M Total, 8512K Used, 248M Free, 3% Inuse > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 11 root 171 0 0K 12K RUN 12:37 89.06% 89.06% idle > 1458 flo 20 0 62816K 49912K kserel 0:22 0.00% 0.00% > thunderbird-bin > 819 flo 76 0 29592K 16904K select 0:12 0.00% 0.00% Xorg > 1777 flo 20 0 93240K 44076K kserel 0:08 0.00% 0.00% > soffice.bin > 1069 flo 20 0 40436K 23956K kserel 0:07 0.00% 0.00% > firefox-bin > > The fan of my laptop is goning crazy with this patch ;-) This was > tested with -CURRENT sources as of today + your patch. I'm using ULE > with libpthread. I'm not sure how the fan can be influenced by this, but I'll keep it in mind when looking into it.. how is performance? thanks for trying it.. > > > Regards, > flo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Fri Aug 27 2004 - 17:03:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:08 UTC