On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:25:04AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 8:05 PM -0400 8/28/04, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >At 7:37 AM -0600 8/27/04, Scott Long wrote: > >> > >>Testing focuses for 5.3-RELEASE > > > >And update on Issue: > > > >> |---------------------------------+ > >> | make -DUSE_KQUEUE causes lockup | > >> | with buildworld -jBIGNUM | > >> |---------------------------------+ > > > >I have done many buildworlds using the WITH_KQUEUE make over the > >past week. I have done at least 50 buildworlds in my dual-proc > >Althon machine, with -j ranging from 3 to 15. I have not seen > >any lockups since the fix for IPI deadlocks went in. > > > >I do still get the "*** Signal 6"s, ... > > I should also point out that I get those same Signal 6's with > `make' compiled without KQUEUE, so the problem is not with > KQUEUE itself. So while I do think there is *some* subtle bug > that is still lurking around, I suspect that the issue about > KQUEUE and `make' can probably be crossed off the to-do list. > > That's my experience, at least. YMMV, etc. > About five people tested the make(1) binary with -DUSE_KQUEUE, when I asked, and reported no lockups. The make(1) built with kqueue(2) did not result in any good/bad change in buildworld times, so I felt like switching to this mode wasn't necessary. In any case, I think the status for this item can safely migrate to status.done now. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:09 UTC