des_at_ raised question realting to implementition of anticipatory scheduler.. http://www.cs.rice.edu/~ssiyer/r/antsched/ shouldnt this be integrated or something? On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:02:40PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > I know that I said last month that we were going to stop promising > specific features for the next major release. However, I'd like to > throw out a list of things that would be really nice to have in the > future, whether its 6.0 or 7.0 or whatever. Most of these tasks are > not trivial, but I hope that talking about them will encourage some > interest. These are in no particular priority order. I'd also be > thrilled if someone wanted to dress this list up in docbook and add > it to the webpage. While this is just my personal list, I'd welcome > other additions to it (in the sense of significant projects, not just > individual PRs or bug fixes that one might be interested in). > > 1. Keyboard multiplexer. We are running into problems with making > ps/2 and USB/bluetooth keyboards work together and work with KVMs. > Having a virtual keyboard device that multiplexes the various real > keyboard devices and handles hotplug can solve this mess pretty > effectively. I know that there has been a lot of talk about this on > mailing lists recently but I don't know how much progress is being made > so I'm listing it here. > > 2. New installer. I know some people still consider this a joke, but > the reality is that sysinstall is no longer state of the art. It's > fairly good at the simple task that it does, but it's becoming harder > and harder to fix bugs and extend functionality in it. It's also > fairly unfriendly to those of us who haven't been using it since 1995. > The DFly folks have some very interesting work in this area > (www.bsdinstaller.com) and it would be very good to see if we can > collaborate with them on it. > > 3. Native PCI Express support. I keep on hoping to take care of this, > but I never seem to have the time to get past designing it. This task > includes 3 parts that are mostly independent. The first is support for > the extended PCI config space and memio access method, the second is > MSI, and the third is link QOS management. If anyone is interested > here, please let me know. > > 4. Journaled filesystem. While we can debate the merits of speed and > data integrety of journalling vs. softupdates, the simple fact remains > that softupdates still requires a fsck run on recovery, and the > multi-terabyte filesystems that are possible these days make fsck a very > long and unpleasant experience, even with bg-fsck. There was work at > some point at RPI to add journaling to UFS, but there hasn't been much > status on that in a long time. There have also been proposals and > works-in-progress to port JFS, ReiserFS, and XFS. Some of these efforts > are still alive, but they need to be seen through to completion. But at > the risk of opening a can of worms here, I'll say that it's also > important to explore non-GPL alternatives. > > 5. Clustered FS support. SANs are all the rage these days, and > clustered filesystems that allow data to be distributed across many > storage enpoints and accessed concurrently through the SAN are very > powerful. RedHat recently bought Sistina and re-opened the GFS source > code, so exploring this would be very interesting. > > 6. Overhaul CAM, add iSCSI. CAM is very parallel-SCSI centric right > now. I have some work-in-progress in Perforce to address this, but it's > pretty minimal. The parallel SCSI knowledge needs to be separated out > and the stack need to be able to cleanly deal with iSCSI, SCSI, SAS, and > maybe even ATA transports. There is a Lucent implementation of iSCSI > for FreeBSD 4.x that could be a useful reference, though it's a > monolithic stack that doesn't really address the shortcomings of CAM. > Having iSCSI infrastructure that supported both hardware and software > implementations would be ideal. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Thu Dec 02 2004 - 15:01:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:23 UTC