Rob said: > > Hi, > > For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: > > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable > standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current > > I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers to STABLE, but > "standard" refers to CURRENT ? > > This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name convention: > > release-supfile : for FreeBSD-RELEASE > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-STABLE > current-supfile : for FreeBSD-CURRENT > > as default supplied files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup ? I agree with you. It has been weird like this ever since 5.x. In the 4.x days they were named with some common sense.Received on Mon Dec 06 2004 - 17:24:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:24 UTC