It appears the TCP urgent pointer is off by 1. In RFC-1122, section 4.2.2.4 on Page 83 describes the urgent pointer error in RFC-793. The 6.0-CURRENT code has the urgent pointer set to (LAST+1). Any comments before I sent a PR ? -- QingReceived on Wed Dec 22 2004 - 20:02:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC