Re: TCP URG point

From: Andre Oppermann <andre_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:16:39 +0100
Li, Qing wrote:
> 	It appears the TCP urgent pointer is off by 1.
> 
> 	In RFC-1122, section 4.2.2.4 on Page 83 describes the
> 	urgent pointer error in RFC-793.
> 
> 	The 6.0-CURRENT code has the urgent pointer set
> 	to (LAST+1).
> 
> 	Any comments before I sent a PR ?

No, please do and send me the PR number.

-- 
Andre
Received on Wed Dec 22 2004 - 20:15:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC