On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 10:57:21AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 25 December 2004 at 16:22:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 10:45:50AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> On Saturday, 25 December 2004 at 15:42:36 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> -current from a few days ago. It was probably unmounting a nullfs, > >>> devfs or linprocfs. > >>> > >>> panic(c06f100c,63676b70,c06efede,e4,c06f4bb5) at panic+0xac > >>> _mtx_lock_spin(deadc0de,0,c06efede,e4,c06f9e60) at _mtx_lock_spin > >>> lockmgr(c59df420,10007,c077c480,ca6e1000,379) at lockmgr+0x132 > >>> dounmount(c59df400,8080000,ca6e1000,379,734ff58) at dounmount+0xa5 > >>> unmount(ca6e1000,f13a6d14,8,e,2) at unmount+0x1f4 > >>> syscall(2f,2f,2f,82ff704,8573911) at syscall+0x13b > >>> Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f > >>> --- syscall (22, FreeBSD ELF32, unmount), eip = 0x82a21df, esp = 0xbfbfe0ac, ebp = 0xbfbfe168 --- > >> > >> Do you have a dump? > > > > No, dumping is broken for me on this and some other machines (it > > starts with 'Dumping 2047 MB' but immediately returns). > > Does this happen if you do 'call doadump' as well? Yeah, that's how I always try and dump since I learned that relying on the kernel to try and dump itself was .. not reliable. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:25 UTC