RE: amd64 or i386 on PE 1850 Intel Xeon with EMT64

Is EM64T is capable to support more that 4Gb RAM? AMD64 does. The news I 
know told me that Intel have problems with more than 32 bit addressing.

    Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
        mailto:stranger_at_sberbank.sibnet.ru
        mailto:stranger_at_fpm.ami.nstu.ru


On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Lawrence Farr wrote:

> The Xeon EMT64 is 64 bit, and the amd64 port of FreeBSD runs
> on it just fine apparently.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Evren Yurtesen
>> Sent: 24 December 2004 07:10
>> To: Stefan Cars
>> Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: amd64 or i386 on PE 1850 Intel Xeon with EMT64
>>
>> amd64 on intel? I dont think it would work.
>>
>> You should use i386.
>>
>> To use amd64, you should get an 64bit AMD processor like AMD Athlon 64
>> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_1
> 18_9484,00.html
>>
>> Evren
>>
>> Stefan Cars wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> How stable is amd64 on Intel Xeon with EMT64 ? We have a
>> new PE 1850
>>> with 4GB memory and two dual 2.8 Xeons. Should I go with
>> i386 or amd64 ?
>>> Which one is most stable and what will I gain from amd64 ?
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Stefan Cars
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>