Re: 652 meg cd?

From: Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:21:37 -0800
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:57:20PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Zimmermann <ulf_at_Alameda.net> writes:
> 
> Ulf> Don't 650MB CD-RW have a little bit less space then 650MB CD-R ?
> Ulf> I seem to recall something like that.
> 
> I'd certainly be intersted in documentation of that.  You'd think that
> they'd be held to truth in advertising on that.

There's a fair bit of variation between brands and batches in media
size.  There is supposed to me a minimum (74 minutes), but it looks like
some CD-R media doesn't quite make it.

http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_cdr_info_fs.shtml

> I did find it strange, tho, that our local office supply store and our
> local computer store are both only carying 650 M CDRW (that's what
> they're labelled anyways) while they almost universally carry 700 M
> CDR's.  Is there some kind of limitation?

Given that CD-RW's are already more marginal then CD-R's I suspect the
80min hack is just too unreliable for most applications.  They do exist,
just google for "80min cdrw" and you'll get plenty of hits.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

Received on Tue Feb 03 2004 - 17:22:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC