On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:12:29PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > ? ??, 04.02.2004, ? 11:31, Joe Marcus Clarke ?????: > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT users > > > > hear this. Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that are > > > > bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users. > > > > > > > > > > I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly about > > > major events over in the ports tree. > > > > I've started doing this. The full summary was sent to ports_at_ and > > ports-developers_at_, plus I added a copy to /usr/ports/CHANGES. This is > > now the second major ports update I've summarized. Once the archives > > get back up to speed, you should be able to see my previous summary. > > How about gettext -> gettext-old transition ? A lot of ports still > depends on gettext-old while others on gettext, gettext conflicts with > gettext-old, and, as result, portupgrade -af constatntly tries to > install gettext-old as dependancy and fails. Not any more...you're out of date :-) Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC