Hello Søren, Sunday, February 15, 2004, 3:56:43 PM, you wrote: > However there are *alot* of bugs in that silicon, making it the most > crappy SATA chip in existance, but what can you expect from the company > that brought us the CMD640 etc ;) Well I just figured out that myself. I think it would be best if you were to kick support for it altogether, considering I can't even get 5.2.1 install on it without paniccing (installing base works, but it crashes somewhere installing src, ports or something). The kernel claims to have suffered a page fault but I've been beating on the memory in question with Memtest86 for quite some time now, without finding any problem at all. I'm gonna get a Highpoint based SATA controller tomorrow to check if it's really the SI chips fault (but I'm pretty sure it is). Had I known this was a successor to CMD640 (one of the (possibly even THE) crappiest ICs ever made), I probably wouldn't have bothered in first place (but background rebuilds startable from BIOS looked charming, nonetheless). Note to self: run away from anything with Silicon Image in it. Best regards, GabrielReceived on Sun Feb 15 2004 - 06:15:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:43 UTC