>> pola. this is purely cosmetic. please don't break my ediff. > POLA is actually the principle you are violating most by taking > this stance. You and I both know that this is -CURRENT, and is the > place where big changes are made. This is the place where this kind > of change would be made, if ever. > > It is the less experienced/less knowledgeable people for whom we > should be concerned about with regards to POLA. and when current becomes stable? what is the functional improvement of the change? what will the user actually get for the pain? a very very few of us who think the generic kernel text has crufted to the max over the years will. 10^(2..3) users who just make kernels will not be happy. randyReceived on Tue Feb 17 2004 - 14:35:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:43 UTC