> I'm no expert either, but that never stopped me from commenting on a topic > :-). > > Here's the relevant part. ktrace shows that bcwipe has opened /dev/da0. > > 13661 bcwipe CALL access(0xbfbfee71,0x6) > 13661 bcwipe NAMI "/dev/da0" > 13661 bcwipe RET access 0 > 13661 bcwipe CALL open(0xbfbfee71,0x82,0xbfbfee71) > 13661 bcwipe NAMI "/dev/da0" > 13661 bcwipe RET open 3 > > I haven't looked up what the lseek syscall does, but I suspect > that you are seek to the start of the file here and you have > succeeded > > 13661 bcwipe CALL lseek(0x3,0,0,0,0x2) > 13661 bcwipe RET lseek 0 > > Here'w where the problems begin. It looks like you are seeking > beyond the end of the device. lseek fails and bcwipe isn't > handling the failure correctly. > > 13661 bcwipe CALL lseek(0x3,0,0xffffffff,0x7fffffff,0) > 13661 bcwipe RET lseek -1/0xffffffff > 13661 bcwipe CALL read(0x3,0xbfbeeba0,0x1) > 13661 bcwipe RET read -1 errno 22 Invalid argument Just for fun, here's the kdump from the "dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1024 count=5 of=/dev/da0" which was successful: http://www.alpete.com/dd.da0.kdump.txt Looks like the open call, plus some: 13760 dd CALL open(0x804f063,0x602,0x1b6) 13760 dd NAMI "/dev/da0" 13760 dd RET open 4 13760 dd CALL fstat(0x4,0xbfbfeca0) 13760 dd RET fstat 0 13760 dd CALL ioctl(0x4,FIODTYPE,0xbfbfec9c) 13760 dd RET ioctl 0 and i don't see much else useful in there... sooo.... how might i fix this? learn C and fix bcwipe? heh...Received on Thu Feb 19 2004 - 12:21:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC