On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2004 19:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > I've cc'd -current because I'd > > like to know if the situation is any different in -CURRENT / 5.2 and > > because someone might want to append the table with results for UDF 1.5 and > > UDF 2.0, which I didn't bother to test because UDF support still isn't > > MFC'd. > > Okay, so I've done it myself already, with the help of a 5.2-Release-p1 > FreeSBIE from GUFI. The Linux used is still the Knoppix 3.2 from the previous > tests, with udftools 1.0.0b2 compiled from source. > > The numbers in the table indicate the UDF version. > > > | Linux | FreeBSD | Windows | Windows | > | (2.4.20) | 5.2R-p1 | 2000 SP4 (*) | 98 SE (*) | > ------|--------------------------------------------------- > UDF | 1.02,1.50 | NO | NO | NO | > Create| 2.01 | | | | > ------|--------------------------------------------------- > UDF | 1.02,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | 1.01,1.50 | > Read | 2.01 | | | | Does this mean that you confirmed that FreeBSD was not able to mount a UDF 2.01 compliant disc? If so, can you let me know if an error was generated, and could you make an image of the disc avaialble for me to look at? ScottReceived on Fri Feb 20 2004 - 13:20:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC