On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:39:42AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:33:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <20040105233138.GR17023_at_cicely12.cicely.de> > > Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely12.cicely.de> writes: > > : On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > : > In message: <20040105231533.GQ17023_at_cicely12.cicely.de> > > : > Bernd Walter <ticso_at_cicely12.cicely.de> writes: > > : > : The point is that it shouldn't take an IRQ for PCI which is configured > > : > : for an ISA device in device.hints. > > : > > > : > We don't do that. > > : > > : We do! > > : > > : /boot/device.hints: > > : hint.sio.0.irq="4" > > : > > : pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 4 > > : pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD routed to irq 4 > > > > Ah, I see what you are saying. That would be hard to implement. After rethinking - it wouldn't be a good idea either, because GENERIC.hints would block to many possible IRQs :( Too bad that ISA components have to be attached after PCI. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso_at_bwct.de info_at_bwct.deReceived on Mon Jan 05 2004 - 14:45:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:36 UTC