It resolved the spurious collisions on my machine(Fortunatelly, I don't have output errors previously, and of course the patch didn't brought me any :P ). Is the following information enough? # uname -a FreeBSD beastie.frontfree.net 5.2-RC FreeBSD 5.2-RC #15: Thu Jan 8 04:26:11 CST 2004 delphij_at_beastie.frontfree.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE i386 # cat /var/run/dmesg.boot dc0: <Macronix 98713 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xe4400000-0xe44000ff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:00:b4:74:8f:2c # ifconfig dc0: flags=18843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 (....address omitted here....) media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active Sincerely, Xin LI, Repomeister and Liaison, The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Don Lewis > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:32 AM > To: current_at_FreeBSD.org > Cc: re_at_FreeBSD.org > Subject: Call for testers - dc ethernet driver patch > > The dc driver has been broken ever since it was converted to > use busdma. > The symptoms are that it reports spurious output errors and > collisions, even when running in full-duplex mode. I believe > the patch below fixes the problem, but I do not have the > appropriate hardware to test it. I have had one gotten one > report so far from someone who claims this patch fixed the > problems he was seeing. I'd appreciate further testing of > this patch, especially with as many of the chipsets supported > by the driver as possible so that I can commit this patch. > Please mention the type of hardware you are using (machine > architecture and card probe > message) in your reports. This is somewhat time critical > because I've had users express interest in getting this into 5.2.Received on Wed Jan 07 2004 - 11:42:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:36 UTC