Status reports - why not regularly?

Hi.

I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD.

I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or 
bi-monthly. I regularly read the cvs-src and current lists, but surely there 
are many developments that I can't understand from the commit messages. And 
what about a regular user, who just reads some relnotes and can't see the 
continuous work?

There are weekly news about what code got into the latest Linux kernels.
But I'd like to know what's going on about FreeBSD! I don't think so that it 
would take a whole day to just write down a few lines every (second) month 
about the work is in progress and/or done.

The last of these reports was written in September last year (by Scott Long 
and Robert Watson).
pity.

My intention is far from hurting anybody. Just want to get the information 
what other OS-users (linux/dragonfly) got.

--


--arutz