Re: Status reports - why not regularly?

From: Josef El-Rayes <josef_at_daemon.li>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:19:11 +0100
"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona_at_theatre.msu.edu> wrote:
> 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and 
> therefore dropped immediatally.  this sort of report is handled 
> wonderfully by dan _at_ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate 
> what he has done
why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
should be covered here too. 

-josef

Received on Tue Jan 13 2004 - 09:19:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:37 UTC