On 14 Jan, Robert Watson wrote: > ino_t probably does need to get bumped to 64-bit on FreeBSD at some point, > because at some point we will have a local file system that can usefully > represent more than 2 billion files. I assume we didn't do the bump with > UFS2 because of the potential disruption for applications, etc. We'd have a heck of a time fsck'ing such a file system on a 32 bit machine.Received on Wed Jan 14 2004 - 12:35:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:38 UTC