On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Don Lewis wrote: DL>On 14 Jan, Robert Watson wrote: DL> DL>> ino_t probably does need to get bumped to 64-bit on FreeBSD at some point, DL>> because at some point we will have a local file system that can usefully DL>> represent more than 2 billion files. I assume we didn't do the bump with DL>> UFS2 because of the potential disruption for applications, etc. DL> DL>We'd have a heck of a time fsck'ing such a file system on a 32 bit DL>machine. If, as a user, I could select between a fast fsck and backups that don't have random filenames linked to each other and lost files, I'd select the good backups. But that's just my opinion :-) harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt_at_fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti_at_freebsd.orgReceived on Wed Jan 14 2004 - 12:41:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:38 UTC