On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:12:21AM -0800, Doug White wrote: > Its in UPDATING on -CURRENT. I guess we need to explicitly warn people to > read the -CURRENT UPDATING and not the -STABLE one when planning their > upgrade. For what it's worth I was reading the right file. If you want to warn people about something warn them not to be afraid of doing something before they actually try it. :-( Booting a 5.X kernel in a 4.X world sounded scary but seems to have worked just fine. > Also see the section "To upgrade in-place from 4.x-stable to current" near > the bottom of the file. Missed that part completely. :-( Thanks. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith_at_cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |Received on Sun Jan 25 2004 - 10:32:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:39 UTC