On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:27:07AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Lanny Baron <lnb_at_FreeBSDsystems.COM> writes: > > That is correct. ad0 and ad1 are subdisks of respective ar* > > it is *not* correct - ad0 and ad1 should not be shown when they are > members of an active array, as any attempt to partition and label them > directly is likely to corrupt the array. older ATA didn't show the members of an active array. ATAng started showing them. :-( I asked sos about it and he said they'ed be exposed for a while until he finished some things he was working on. Maybe sos can update us on the state of things and the plans.Received on Fri Jan 30 2004 - 23:22:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC