Re: ata0-raid oddness.

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:27:07 +0100
Lanny Baron <lnb_at_FreeBSDsystems.COM> writes:
> That is correct. ad0 and ad1 are subdisks of respective ar*

it is *not* correct - ad0 and ad1 should not be shown when they are
members of an active array, as any attempt to partition and label them
directly is likely to corrupt the array.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Fri Jan 23 2004 - 14:27:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:39 UTC