On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Content-Description: signed data > > like I reported some weeks ago, SCHED_ULE seems to ignore nice. > Since it's now the default I gave it another try and did the following simple > test: > > SCHED_ULE: > seti in background (doesn't matter if nice=20 or 15) > /usr/ports/sysutils/cpdup > make install takes Minutes > > Without seti it takes some seconds > > SCHED_4BSD: > seti in background (doesn't matter if nice=20 or 15) > /usr/ports/sysutils/cpdup > make install finishes in seconds. No difference with or without seti > > > Please let us know when nice gets respected by SCHED_ULE so I can really use > it as default scheduler. > Seems to work for me. You need to describe your problem better. last pid: 70890; load averages: 2.49, 1.86, 1.54 up 1+17:55:17 13:23:16 64 processes: 5 running, 59 sleeping CPU states: 16.8% user, 4.6% nice, 77.7% system, 1.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 120M Active, 176M Inact, 58M Wired, 18M Cache, 48M Buf, 1072K Free Swap: 356M Total, 356M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 592 kargl 76 0 35248K 34284K RUN 600:36 1.56% 1.56% XFree86 70093 kargl 8 20 1708K 1000K wait 0:00 1.56% 1.56% sh 70889 kargl 139 20 4152K 3148K RUN 0:00 1.56% 1.56% cc1 70887 kargl 8 20 328K 220K wait 0:00 1.56% 1.56% gcc 70886 kargl 8 20 1708K 1000K wait 0:00 1.56% 1.56% sh 822 kargl 76 0 5000K 3276K select 2:02 0.78% 0.78% xterm 70792 root 8 0 1336K 1216K wait 0:00 0.78% 0.78% make 70888 root 8 0 1660K 944K wait 0:00 0.78% 0.78% sh 70890 root 139 0 1568K 632K RUN 0:00 0.78% 0.78% gzip 606 kargl 76 0 5068K 3340K RUN 0:01 0.00% 0.00% xterm 70765 kargl 76 0 2312K 1364K RUN 0:00 0.00% 0.00% top -- SteveReceived on Sat Jan 31 2004 - 12:24:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:41 UTC