Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:32:56, noackjr wrote about "Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash)": > >>>>lock order reversal > >> > >>*yawn* :-) > > > >As newer -current is said as too broken, it wasn't got. If > >revolutions round is finished, please say date for moderately calm > >period which can be used for cvsupping. > > I think you misunderstand. This lock order reversal is a frequently > reported false positive. It is harmless. For more information (see LOR > id #1): > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html Thanks. Whether should be added to `-current FAQ' and posted regularly? > Kris responded with a yawn because he's answered this question so many > times.... It wasn't a question.;) -netch-Received on Thu Jul 01 2004 - 07:35:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC