On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:56:43AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that ps -e has lost its functionality or its behavior has > been changed between 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT, or I have did something > incorrect? [...] > Is this intentional? This is documented, but not very well: The process file system (see procfs(5)) should be mounted when ps is exe- cuted, otherwise not all information will be available. As far as I'm aware, this only affects the -e option and possibly the displaying of argument lists too long to fit into the kernel's argument cache. See PR 54604 for a fix from pjd_at_ for ps -e that has not been committed yet. TimReceived on Fri Jul 02 2004 - 02:14:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC