On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:12:00PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:20:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > - ia64: internal errors in ld(1) > > > > > > Way, way at the bottom of my task list. > > > Others are certainly free to look into this. > > > > > Marcel sent you a patch that fixes BFD configuration for ia64 > > on 32-bit machines. > > > > > > - sparc64: generates bad assembler in gnu/usr.bin/tar > > > > > > See ia64 responce above. > > > > > sparc64 will probably need the same patch. > > No. It's a compiler bug on sparc64. I think the old binutils just > didn't complain about the invalid instruction. I compared the > output of the native cc and the cross cc and they are different. > Not much, but fataly so. > Yes, I produced that diff as well (by using -save-temps). Unfortunately, I don't know sparc64 assembler at all... But why it worked before BU upgrade? (We didn't have these tinderbox failures.) Does GCC use some of the BU bits internally? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:00 UTC