Re: ethercons updated for -CURRENT

From: Danny Braniss <danny_at_cs.huji.ac.il>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:59:33 +0300
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:40, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > The upshot off all this is, if the SOL works, then we can kiss KVM away,
> > and as Robert said, just power and ethernet and you are set.
> 
> You could probably use fwcons (I've only used it a little to test) but I think 
> once it's enabled the target doesn't have to be cooperative for it to work 
> (although then you need to run firewire to your boxes as well as ethernet)
> 

serial/firewire are ok for one computer, but when you have several, then
this does not scale (imaging a cabinet with 30 1U boxes :-).

appart from that, ethernet (once you overcome some basic security issues)
is great to get the console.

danny
Received on Sat Jul 10 2004 - 07:59:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC