In message <40F4562D.2020101_at_linuxpowered.com>, Jon Disnard writes: >As an example, I think of the (20031112) statfs entry in UPDATING. >What is the sequence of "make world" again? What caused so many problems >during the statfs updates, was it not partly because of "make world"? >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that "make >world" does not have this sequence: I think the problem here is that people type "make world" when they shouldn't. The reason they shouldn't was because we explicitly told them not to and they either didn't read the warning/info/docs or they didn't understand them or they thought it didn't apply to them. Removing the world target will not fix that. But removing the world target will make a lot of documentation wrong, about 22900 pages of documentation according to google. Even if we think that the 22000 pieces of documentation is copies of the handbook which will automatically be fixed, that leaves 900 pages too many. Find a better solution please. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Tue Jul 13 2004 - 19:49:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC