On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:44:47PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > Hi > > The man pages for unionfs basically say to avoid it as it has problems. > However, I was wondering about people's experience with it for read > only mounts. I would like to do a bunch of read only mounts. I > currently use nfs with localhost: but think that performance might be > better with unionfs. I kind of get the impression that the unionfs > problems are with read write and so would like to solicit opinions and > experience running on FBSD5 (CURRENT going to 5.3-R). Sounds like you actually want nullfs, which works fine at least when read-only. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC