Re: One more .....

From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw_at_withagen.nl>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:39:16 +0200
From: "Marcel Moolenaar" <marcel_at_xcllnt.net>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 07:30:31PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> >
> > panic: process 82471(sh):2 holds Giant but isn't blocked on a lock
> >
> > cpuid = 1;
> > KDB: enter: panic
> >
> > Is there any purpose in reporting these crashes this way???
>
> You might want to make sure your debugger backend is DDB and not
> GDB.

This is what I have:
# Debugging for use in -current
options         KDB                     # Enable kernel debugger support.
options         KDB_TRACE
options         DDB                     # Support DDB.
options         GDB                     # Support remote GDB.
options         INVARIANTS              # Enable calls of extra sanity checking
options         INVARIANT_SUPPORT       # Extra sanity checks of internal struct
ures, required by INVARIANTS
options         WITNESS                 # Enable checks to detect deadlocks and
cycles
options         WITNESS_SKIPSPIN        # Don't run witness on spinlocks for spe
ed

Next to having an SMP/Opteron system.

--WjW
Received on Fri Jul 16 2004 - 17:47:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC