Matthew Dillon wrote: > I would expect it to perform about the same as the existing code. The > main reasons to use it are that it consolidates the half dozen IPI > mechanisms used by FreeBSD-5 into *one* mechanism, it completely Don't you (and others on this list) think that these things come a bit late now? I have just subscribed to this list since I'm using 5.2.1 and what I expected were discussions like, the last few bugs being ironed out, things getting polished for a stable 5.x tree, and not grass-roots discussions about the basic system architecture. This comes about 2-3 years late, folks. Please get your things together and stabilize the beast now. -- Matthias Buelow; mkb_at_{mukappabeta,informatik.uni-wuerzburg}.deReceived on Sun Jul 18 2004 - 00:15:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC