Matthias Buelow wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> I would expect it to perform about the same as the existing code. >> The >> main reasons to use it are that it consolidates the half dozen IPI >> mechanisms used by FreeBSD-5 into *one* mechanism, it completely > > > Don't you (and others on this list) think that these things come a bit > late now? I have just subscribed to this list since I'm using 5.2.1 and > what I expected were discussions like, the last few bugs being ironed > out, things getting polished for a stable 5.x tree, and not grass-roots > discussions about the basic system architecture. This comes about 2-3 > years late, folks. Please get your things together and stabilize the > beast now. > The 'fix the bugs' discussions are going on too. However, this is the freebsd-current list, and it's always nice to discuss things that might be suitable further down the road. ScottReceived on Sun Jul 18 2004 - 00:30:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC