Re: Excellent job on the firewire support!

From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:08:50 +0930
On Tuesday, 20 July 2004 at 11:41:52 +0900, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
> (sorry for resending)
>
> At Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:04:53 +0100,
> Doug Rabson wrote:
>>> 2) Is dcons usable after a panic (ie, DDB or KDB_TRACE)?  Or is it
>>>    only usable for remote-gdb?
>>
>> Dcons provides two full duplex streams - one for console and one for
>> gdb. You can use DDB on the console just like normal.
>
> It's designed for such panic/debugging situation.
> Actually, it's rather inefficient for usual situation
> but the speed of FireWire hide the problem ;-)

I think that the most spectacular use of firewire is debugging a
completely hung system.  If you've already attached, the debugger can
still access the memory of a system which isn't reacting *at all*.
Obviously you can't continue execution, but just seeing what's in
memory is a great advantage.

On the other hand, it was my understanding that marcel's new kernel
debugging framework broke firewire debugging.  What's the current
status there?

Greg
--
Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen.
Finger grog_at_FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.

Received on Tue Jul 20 2004 - 22:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC